Картография Онтологии: Государство Искусства

Yannis Kalfoglou, Marco Schorlemmer, “Ontology Mapping: The State of the Art”, public translation into Russian from English More about this translation.

See also 3 similar translations

Another translations: into Polish. Translate into another language.

Participants

sally67 points
umnik9 points
ksuhlik4 points
Join Translated.by to translate! If you already have a Translated.by account, please sign in.
If you do not want to register an account, you can sign in with OpenID.
Pages: ← previous Ctrl next next untranslated

Ontology Mapping: The State of the Art

Картография Онтологии: Государство Искусства

History of edits (Latest: ksuhlik 1 year, 11 months ago) §

Abstract. Ontology mapping is seen as a solution provider in today’s landscape of ontology research. As the number of ontologies that are made publicly available and accessible on the Web increases steadily, so does the need for applications to use them. A single ontology is no longer enough to support the tasks envisaged by a distributed environment like the Semantic Web. Multiple ontologies need to be accessed from several applications. Mapping could provide a common layer from which several ontologies could be accessed and hence could exchange information in semantically sound manners. Developing such mappings has been the focus of a variety of works originating from diverse communities over a number of years. In this article we comprehensively review and present these works. We also provide insights on the pragmatics of ontology mapping and elaborate on a theoretical approach for defining ontology mapping.

Введение. Отображение онтологии представляется обеспечением решений в современном круге исследования онтологий. Как неуклонно растет число онтологий, которые открыты для публичного доступа в Интернет , так возрастает и потребность в использовании их приложениями.

History of edits (Latest: sally 3 years ago) §

1 Introduction

1 Введение

History of edits (Latest: umnik 3 years, 3 months ago) §

Nowadays, the interested practitioner in ontology mapping, is often faced with a knotty problem: there is an enormous amount of diverse work originating from different communities who claim some sort of relevance to ontology mapping. For example, terms and works encountered in the literature which claimed to be relevant include: alignment, merging, articulation, fusion, integration, morphism, and so on. Given this diversity, it is difficult to identify the problem areas and comprehend solutions provided. Part of the problem is the lack of a comprehensivesurvey, a standard terminology, hidden assumptions or undisclosed technical details, and the dearth of evaluation metrics.

This article aims to fill-in some of these gaps, primarily the first one: lack of a comprehensive survey. We scrutinised the literature and critically reviewed works originating from a variety of fields to provide a comprehensive overview of ontology mapping work to date. We also worked on the theoretical grounds for

defining ontology mapping, which could act as the glue for better understanding similarities and pinpointing differences in the works reported.

Pages: ← previous Ctrl next next untranslated

License: This work is supported under the Advanced Knowledge Technologies (AKT) Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration (IRC), which is sponsored by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under grant number GR/N15764/01. The AKT IRC comprises t